Guides & How-Tos

FUE vs FUT Decision Guide Tool

February 23, 20264 min read1,000 words

Choosing between FUE and FUT starts with knowing your Norwood stage and graft requirements. This guide walks you through the decision factors and points you to a free AI tool that gives you personalized data in under 60 seconds.

How to Use the Decision Guide

Step 1: Get your Norwood stage. Upload a clear photo of your hairline at myhairline.ai/analyze. The AI uses 468 MediaPipe facial landmarks to measure your hairline position, temple recession, and vertex coverage. You receive a Norwood classification and estimated graft count.

Step 2: Match your stage to the decision table below. Your graft requirements determine which procedure is most practical.

Step 3: Factor in your personal priorities. Scarring tolerance, budget, and hairstyle preferences all influence the final choice.

FUE vs FUT Decision Table

Your SituationRecommended MethodWhy
Norwood 2-3, under 2,200 graftsFUEMinimal scarring, fast recovery, well within FUE capacity
Norwood 3V-4, 2,000-3,500 graftsFUE or FUTBoth methods handle this range well. Choose based on scar preference
Norwood 5-6, 3,000-6,000 graftsFUT or FUE+FUT comboFUT maximizes graft yield; combo approach covers large areas
Norwood 7, 5,500-7,500 graftsFUT + FUE comboMaximum graft extraction needed from both methods
Want short hairstylesFUENo linear scar visible at short lengths
Budget-consciousFUT20-30% lower cost per graft than FUE
Prior FUT scarFUEAvoids additional linear scarring
Limited donor densityFUECan harvest from beard and body donor areas

Key Differences at a Glance

FeatureFUEFUT
Scar typeDot scars (0.7-1.0mm)Linear scar (hidden by hair)
Recovery7-10 days10-14 days
Max grafts/session5,0004,000
Graft survival90-95%90-95%
Cost per graft (US)$4-6$3-5
Donor shavingRequiredNot required

What the AI Tool Measures

The AI hair loss analysis at myhairline.ai works by detecting 468 facial landmarks using the MediaPipe framework. The system measures:

  • Hairline position: Distance from brow ridge to hairline in centimeters, compared against age-adjusted norms
  • Temple recession: Depth and angle of temporal recession on both sides
  • Vertex coverage: Density estimation in the crown area using visible scalp ratio
  • Symmetry analysis: Left-right comparison of recession patterns

These measurements map to the Norwood scale reference classification system, which surgeons use worldwide to plan transplant procedures.

Graft Estimates by Stage

Norwood StageGraft RangeTypical Cost (US, FUE)Typical Cost (Turkey, FUE)
2800-1,500$3,200-9,000$800-3,000
31,500-2,200$6,000-13,200$1,500-4,400
3V2,000-2,800$8,000-16,800$2,000-5,600
42,500-3,500$10,000-21,000$2,500-7,000
53,000-4,500$12,000-27,000$3,000-9,000
64,000-6,000$16,000-36,000$4,000-12,000
75,500-7,500$22,000-45,000$5,500-15,000

Limitations of Photo-Based Assessment

AI analysis provides an accurate Norwood classification but cannot replace a full clinical consultation. A surgeon's in-person evaluation adds:

  • Scalp laxity measurement (important for FUT candidacy)
  • Donor area density count using a densitometer
  • Hair caliber assessment (fine vs coarse hair affects coverage)
  • Miniaturization ratio (percentage of thinning follicles)

Use your AI assessment as a starting point for informed conversations with surgeons, not as a final surgical plan.

Get Your Free Assessment

Upload a photo at myhairline.ai/analyze to receive your Norwood stage, graft estimate, and a personalized FUE vs FUT recommendation. No account required. Results in under 60 seconds.

FAQ

Is AI-based Norwood staging accurate?

AI-based Norwood staging using facial landmark detection achieves high accuracy when photos are taken in good lighting from the correct angle. myhairline.ai uses 468 MediaPipe landmarks to measure hairline position, temple recession, and vertex thinning against clinical reference data.

Do I need an account to use the tools?

No. myhairline.ai's AI hair loss analysis is completely free and does not require an account, email address, or any personal information. You upload a photo, receive your Norwood stage and graft estimate, and can save or discard the results.

How does myhairline.ai compare to a clinical assessment?

myhairline.ai provides a Norwood stage classification based on the same visual criteria dermatologists use. It measures hairline position and recession patterns with 468 facial landmarks. A clinical assessment adds scalp density measurement and donor evaluation that photo analysis cannot replicate.

Medical disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a board-certified dermatologist or hair restoration surgeon before making treatment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

AI-based Norwood staging using facial landmark detection achieves high accuracy when photos are taken in good lighting from the correct angle. myhairline.ai uses 468 MediaPipe landmarks to measure hairline position, temple recession, and vertex thinning against clinical reference data.

Ready to Assess Your Hair Loss?

Get an AI-powered Norwood classification and personalized graft estimate in 30 seconds. No downloads, no account required.

Start Free Analysis